Photo credit: Shutterstock |
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but
a recent study suggests that Spot isn't actually making you any healthier.
Since the 1980s,
we've heard that having a pet leads to better health, whether it's higher
survival rates from myocardial infarction, a lower number of GP visits, reduced
risk of asthma, or better physical and psychological well-being, particularly
in the elderly. And there's no question that having a pet provides
companionship—and the opportunity to get more human interaction (just visit any
dog park for evidence of this!).
Trouble is, there are so many factors
that go into determining the correlation between having a pet and being
healthy, it's hard to know if one can really cause the other.
The most recent study, courtesy of RAND and run by Harvard-trained
biostatician Layla Parast, found that it's less about the pets and more about
what they signify: namely, that families with pets tend to be better off
financially, which means they can afford bigger homes and better healthcare.
The study looked at more than 5,000
households and analyzed children's health, comparing kids in homes with cats
versus children in homes without cats. (Don't worry, dog-lovers: portions of
the study included dogs as well.) While researchers found that children from
cat-owning homes did tend to have "better general health" and parents
who were less concerned about their mood, behavior, or learning abilities,
there was no direct evidence that the pets had anything to do with it.
"I think there are many other
positive benefits to owning a pet besides thinking that it will improve your
health," said Parast.
"Obviously having a pet brings joy and companionship and a multitude of
other things."
She added that, as a pet owner herself,
she'd be very pleased to see future research supporting the idea that pets can
have a positive influence on their owners' health. "It would be great to
have a reason to hand out cuddly puppies to everyone who needs better
health," she was quick to add. "I would be completely in favor of
that. But there's no scientific evidence right now that shows that."
No comments:
Post a Comment